Can anyone actually name ONE concrete way gay marriage effects anything negativly?

People always say lesbian/gays are destroying the very foundation of this country and the sacred of marriage (marriage between man and women). HOW are they doing this, and not just a philisophical answer...somthing concrete that would effect me.Can anyone actually name ONE concrete way gay marriage effects anything negativly?
There's no rational behind it. People just talk about being uncomfortable. Most people are uncomfortable with marrying cousins but it's legal in plenty of states.Can anyone actually name ONE concrete way gay marriage effects anything negativly?
So now that you have read the responses to your question, I think it is safe for you to conclude that the real answer is, ';No, there is no concrete way gay marriage affects anyone negatively.';





Don't you just love when someone asks for concrete facts and gets nothing but opinion and religious dogma in response?





Note: Every study done on children with same sex parents (and there have been quite a few) have found no difference between those children versus those raised by traditional families.
Well ever since the first cavemen started reproducing, it's apparently always been 1 guy, 1 girl. When this country was founded, gays were unheard of: because we were more religious back then and it says in the Bible that ';no man shall lay with another man.'; So nobody did it. Well, now that a lot of folks aren't so religious anymore, they stopped beliving in that, and the people who a still religious are getting pissed because it's disrupting the old status quo.





I also heard somewhere in health class that folks who do non-safe sex (i.e. anal sex, oral sex) are more prone to STD's, but that's up for debate.
the only negative result of legalizing gay marriage that I've ever heard is actually tax related. Homosexual couples often are employed in higher-earning positions, and are often educated (college degrees). Since they do not currently qualify for the married tax bracket, they pay a lot into the system, but use few services (schools, medical, etc.). If gay couples are allowed to use the married filing status, the government will lose millions of dollars in taxes.





Its a stupid reason to disallow gay marriage, but honestly it's the only logical argument I've ever heard against it.





Gay marriage will be legalized eventually...it's just a matter of time. As a straight person, I don't see how it affects me negatively. I'm certainly not going to say ';two men marrying each other is exactly like me marrying someone or something that can't consent!';.
I wonder what effect this would have on immigration of spouses and whether marriage fraud for immigration purposes would increase and/or be more difficult to discover if the marriage is for a fraudulent purpose.





When couples have children it is a pretty good indication the marriage is bona fide.
One example would be that gay couples would be able to raise children together, which may then have a bad upbringing due to the lack of a mother and father.





That's the only thing I can think of, and I believe that is the only case in which gay couples should not have equal rights.
I don't care what they do. I know that in the end they will all burn in hell for their sins. Whether or not they claim to be married in this life is of no consequence to me.
with hetero marriage having a 50% success/failure rate, we've already made a mockery of marriage. why not give someone else a try??!!
it's a moral thing, if someone wants to get off with a person of the same sex go for it just don't push it on/in others.
well..........I zipped off a letter to the Chamber of Commerce in Sodom and Gomorrah,but so far they haven't answered....must be out for a while....will get back to you when I hear from'em.................thanks
no. it's just people with homophopia.
Nope.
i never care for any one
It's a moral issue that MOST people aren't comfortable with.


Having sex with farm animals doesn't hurt anyone either, but that doesn't mean it should be permitted.


It should be Adam %26amp; Eve, not Adam %26amp; Steve.